Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cushman & Wakefield Limited
How Cushman & Wakefield Limited stacks up
CWK · against 154 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
79/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #19 of 155 · scores higher than 87% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including CWK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.2% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.8% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 87% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.0% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CWK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 162 reported | 2.1% | 5.2% | 22% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | 10.2% | 5.4% | 96% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 75 reported | 7.8% | 6.7% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | 63.3% | 104.1% | 21% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CWK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.2B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 96 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 3 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 4 | 1.7B USD | 92 | 41 | |
| 5 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 89 | 83 | |
| 15 | 4.8B USD | 81 | 52 | |
| 17 | 2.1B EUR (≈$2.3B) | 80 | 58 | |
| 17 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 80 | 58 | |
| 19 | 81.4B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 79 | 46 | |
| 19 | 3.2B USD | 79 | 44 | |
| 19 | 6.3B AUD (≈$4.2B) | 79 | 66 | |
| 22 | 319.2B JPY (≈$2.2B) | 78 | 48 | |
| 22 | 53.8B ZAR (≈$3.0B) | 78 | 59 | |
| 24 | 7.6B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 75 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score