Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cushman & Wakefield Limited
How Cushman & Wakefield Limited stacks up
CWK · against 165 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #91 of 166 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score19 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including CWK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger return on invested capital, but weaker operating margin and return on assets than most Real Estate peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 81% of peers. Operating margin: 4.4% vs peer median 26.8%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on assets: 0.9% vs peer median 2.1%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 86% of peers. Return on invested capital: 9.0% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CWK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 166 reported | 9.0% | 3.6% | 90% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 159 reported | 4.4% | 42.5% | 8% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 164 reported | 0.9% | 2.3% | 19% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 161 reported | 3.5% | 6.0% | 32% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 166 reported | 18.1% | 64.4% | 8% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CWK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 2 | 314.6B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 97 | 75 | |
| 2 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 2 | 49.88T IDR (≈$3.1B) | 97 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 86 | 4.3B SGD (≈$3.3B) | 52 | 52 | |
| 89 | 682.7B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 51 | 57 | |
| 89 | 3.8B USD | 51 | 42 | |
| 91 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 50 | 51 | |
| 91 | 3.2B USD | 50 | 44 | |
| 91 | 4.6B USD | 50 | 66 | |
| 94 | 683.7B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 49 | 50 | |
| 94 | 21.5B SEK (≈$2.1B) | 49 | 51 | |
| 94 | 4.0B SGD (≈$3.1B) | 49 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score