Ranked #205 of 262 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
26 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CWBC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.2% vs peer median 7.9%
●Book yield is close to the peer norm. Book yield: 88.0% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWBC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
CWBC
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 264 reported
5.7%
8.7%
20%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 49 reported
Not reported
10.9%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 157 reported
6.8%
7.9%
42%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 264 reported
85.3%
87.1%
49%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
