Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CWAN · against 278 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #94 of 279 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)29 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CWAN · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta and current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CWAN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 270 reported | 0.42× | 0.33× | 42% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 264 reported | 0.60 | 1.04 | 84% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 277 reported | 2.25× | 1.78× | 64% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 5 | 27.4B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 90 | 12.9B USD | 60 | 47 | |
| 91 | 4.0B USD | 60 | 46 | |
| 92 | 986.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 60 | 52 | |
| 93 | 3.7B USD | 60 | 67 | |
| 94 | 7.3B USD | 59 | 36 | |
| 95 | 161.3B TWD (≈$5.0B) | 58 | 57 | |
| 96 | 14.5B USD | 58 | 40 | |
| 97 | 6.5B USD | 58 | 64 | |
| 98 | 74.0B CNY (≈$10.4B) | 58 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score