Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
How Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. stacks up
CWAN · against 278 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
27/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #240 of 279 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score15 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including CWAN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 73% of peers. Return on assets: -0.1% vs peer median 2.9%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on invested capital: 0.9% vs peer median 6.8%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWAN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CWAN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 263 reported | 0.9% | 11.3% | 17% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 277 reported | Not reported | 9.8% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 271 reported | -0.1% | 4.7% | 15% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 265 reported | -3.1% | 11.9% | 10% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 280 reported | 66.0% | 40.9% | 79% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CWAN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 863.2B INR (≈$10.4B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 1 | 7.3B USD | 99 | 68 | |
| 4 | 76.2B CNY (≈$10.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 4 | 40.0B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 237 | 13.3B USD | 29 | 50 | |
| 237 | 10.4B USD | 29 | 41 | |
| 237 | 7.7B USD | 29 | 47 | |
| 240 | 328.8B TWD (≈$10.2B) | 27 | 37 | |
| 240 | 7.3B USD | 27 | 36 | |
| 242 | 35.7B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 26 | 31 | |
| 242 | 89.9B CNY (≈$12.6B) | 26 | 40 | |
| 244 | 28.9B HKD (≈$3.7B) | 25 | 41 | |
| 244 | 217.4B TWD (≈$6.7B) | 25 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score