Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Curtiss-Wright Corporation
How Curtiss-Wright Corporation stacks up
CW · against 215 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
34/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #168 of 216 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 68% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.3% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 205 reported | 2.9% | 3.9% | 27% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 216 reported | 4.4% | 6.7% | 19% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 110 reported | 3.4% | 3.6% | 46% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 202 reported | 15.1% | 25.2% | 23% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 3 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 91.3B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 12.69T CLP (≈$14.0B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 163 | 20.9B USD | 35 | 61 | |
| 163 | 16.2B USD | 35 | 66 | |
| 168 | 138.9B CNY (≈$19.5B) | 34 | 66 | |
| 168 | 11.9B USD | 34 | 63 | |
| 168 | 18.4B USD | 34 | 61 | |
| 171 | 12.4B USD | 33 | 36 | |
| 171 | 97.3B SEK (≈$9.7B) | 33 | 43 | |
| 171 | 28.7B CHF (≈$33.0B) | 33 | 32 | |
| 171 | 12.5B USD | 33 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score