Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CVSA · against 145 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #109 of 146 · scores higher than 26% of peers · safety percentile 29
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CVSA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CVSA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 144 reported | 0.63× | 0.34× | 36% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 143 reported | 0.65 | 0.33 | 18% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 139 reported | 1.09× | 1.61× | 22% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 4 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 5 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 105 | 402.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 32 | 42 | |
| 106 | 18.5B CNY (≈$2.6B) | 32 | 29 | |
| 107 | 8.2B USD | 31 | 17 | |
| 108 | 2.2B USD | 30 | 22 | |
| 109 | 4.1B USD | 29 | 63 | |
| 110 | 2.1B USD | 29 | 42 | |
| 111 | 7.6B USD | 27 | 33 | |
| 112 | 3.6B AUD (≈$2.4B) | 26 | 42 | |
| 113 | 25.1B HKD (≈$3.2B) | 26 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score