Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CVS Health Corporation
How CVS Health Corporation stacks up
CVS · against 454 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #295 of 455 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score25 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CVS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.0% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CVS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CVS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 475 reported | 7.4% | 11.0% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 171 reported | 7.0% | 21.2% | 34% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 433 reported | 7.0% | 11.0% | 40% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CVS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 8.8B USD | 99 | 31 | |
| 2 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 289 | 43.2B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 289 | 253M USD | 50 | 15 | |
| 289 | 3.0B USD | 50 | 39 | |
| 289 | 1.6B USD | 50 | 48 | |
| 295 | 116.9B USD | 49 | 47 | |
| 295 | 6.6B USD | 49 | 61 | |
| 295 | 100.2B USD | 49 | 68 | |
| 298 | 49.5B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 298 | 201M USD | 48 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score