Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cousins Properties Incorporated
How Cousins Properties Incorporated stacks up
CUZ · against 141 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
81/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #9 of 142 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including CUZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.1% vs peer median 5.3%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.4% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 78% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.2% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CUZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CUZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | 0.1% | 4.9% | 10% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | 7.6% | 5.4% | 90% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 69 reported | 3.3% | 5.9% | 21% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 93.2% | 92.1% | 51% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CUZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 68 | |
| 5 | 880.1B JPY (≈$6.0B) | 84 | 64 | |
| 5 | 135.9B MXN (≈$7.3B) | 84 | 76 | |
| 7 | 4.6B USD | 83 | 66 | |
| 8 | 46.6B MXN (≈$2.5B) | 82 | 73 | |
| 9 | 17.5B MYR (≈$3.9B) | 81 | 84 | |
| 9 | 4.8B USD | 81 | 52 | |
| 11 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 80 | 58 | |
| 12 | 81.4B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 79 | 46 | |
| 12 | 3.2B USD | 79 | 44 | |
| 12 | 6.3B AUD (≈$4.2B) | 79 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score