Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CubeSmart
How CubeSmart stacks up
CUBE · against 106 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
43/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #87 of 107 · scores higher than 18% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CUBE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -10.0% vs peer median 11.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.9% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CUBE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CUBE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 108 reported | 3.9% | 6.4% | 34% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 88 reported | -10.0% | 14.7% | 20% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 106 reported | 3.0% | 7.6% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CUBE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 83 | 5.9B USD | 48 | 43 | |
| 85 | 12.1B USD | 46 | 43 | |
| 86 | 11.2B SGD (≈$8.5B) | 45 | 52 | |
| 87 | 18.1B SGD (≈$13.8B) | 43 | 55 | |
| 87 | 10.0B USD | 43 | 45 | |
| 89 | 5.0B GBP (≈$6.5B) | 42 | 40 | |
| 90 | 7.4B USD | 40 | 46 | |
| 91 | 5.1B USD | 39 | 23 | |
| 92 | 94.4B HKD (≈$12.1B) | 38 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score