Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Corteva, Inc.
How Corteva, Inc. stacks up
CTVA · against 197 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 198 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score21 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including CTVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 35.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 94% of peers. Earnings yield: 12.7% vs peer median 3.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.9% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTVA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 198 reported | 13.6% | 5.5% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 201 reported | 6.1% | 10.8% | 23% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | 25.8% | 4.4% | 98% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 192 reported | 115.4% | 49.8% | 90% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTVA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 155.7B ZAR (≈$8.6B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 1 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 62 | |
| 3 | 226.1B THB (≈$6.3B) | 96 | 42 | |
| 3 | 5.9B CAD (≈$4.3B) | 96 | 77 | |
| 6 | 87.3B HKD (≈$11.2B) | 95 | 72 | |
| 6 | 45.7B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 95 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score