Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Corteva, Inc.
How Corteva, Inc. stacks up
CTVA · against 195 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #143 of 196 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score22 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including CTVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 80% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -26.7% vs peer median 9.4%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.7% vs peer median 3.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 0.5% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTVA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 197 reported | 3.7% | 8.7% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 158 reported | -26.7% | 14.8% | 15% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 195 reported | 0.5% | 2.5% | 43% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTVA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 97.93T IDR (≈$6.1B) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 5 | 11.9B CAD (≈$8.7B) | 99 | 80 | |
| 139 | 39.7B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 39 | 55 | |
| 139 | 34.2B CNY (≈$4.8B) | 39 | 37 | |
| 139 | 10.5B EUR (≈$11.5B) | 39 | 37 | |
| 139 | 85.0B SEK (≈$8.5B) | 39 | 47 | |
| 143 | 7.9B USD | 38 | 62 | |
| 143 | 6.9B USD | 38 | 63 | |
| 145 | 45.0B SEK (≈$4.5B) | 37 | 52 | |
| 146 | 7.5B USD | 36 | 43 | |
| 146 | 1.12T INR (≈$13.5B) | 36 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score