Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CTS Corporation
How CTS Corporation stacks up
CTS · against 475 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
77/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #104 of 476 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score58 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including CTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 73% of peers. Return on invested capital: 15.7% vs peer median 6.8%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 80% of peers. Operating margin: 16.4% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 83% of peers. Return on assets: 8.8% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 456 reported | 15.7% | 7.0% | 75% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 475 reported | 16.4% | 7.1% | 81% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 467 reported | 8.8% | 3.0% | 86% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 463 reported | 12.4% | 7.5% | 66% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 477 reported | 39.7% | 32.8% | 64% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 202.6B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 2 | 170.7B INR (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 388.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 81.3B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 100 | 3.4B USD | 78 | 69 | |
| 104 | 135.5B JPY (≈$921M) | 77 | 65 | |
| 104 | 90.9B TWD (≈$2.8B) | 77 | 59 | |
| 104 | 2.4B SGD (≈$1.8B) | 77 | 72 | |
| 104 | 1.8B USD | 77 | 63 | |
| 104 | 937M USD | 77 | 74 | |
| 104 | 901M USD | 77 | 58 | |
| 104 | 2.3B USD | 77 | 79 | |
| 111 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 76 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score