Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CTS Corporation
How CTS Corporation stacks up
CTS · against 471 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #286 of 472 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score46 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 71% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.2% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.5% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 17.1% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 476 reported | 8.5% | 9.3% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 316 reported | 17.1% | 6.3% | 61% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | -1.2% | 5.3% | 28% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 55 | |
| 3 | 39.3B TWD (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 81 | |
| 3 | 267.8B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 282 | 901M USD | 43 | 58 | |
| 286 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 42 | 39 | |
| 286 | 16.6B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 42 | 63 | |
| 286 | 1.8B USD | 42 | 44 | |
| 286 | 1.8B USD | 42 | 63 | |
| 286 | 1.2B USD | 42 | 41 | |
| 291 | 60.8B TWD (≈$1.9B) | 41 | 67 | |
| 291 | 35.6B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 41 | 45 | |
| 291 | 107.2B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 41 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score