Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CTOS · against 652 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #639 of 653 · scores higher than 2% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)52 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CTOS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CTOS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 642 reported | 3.05× | 0.41× | 3% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 630 reported | 1.44 | 0.67 | 8% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 623 reported | 1.28× | 1.58× | 31% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 38 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 3 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 185.7B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 55 | |
| 5 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 635 | 2.4B EUR (≈$2.7B) | 3 | 35 | |
| 636 | 247.8B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 3 | 48 | |
| 637 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 2 | 60 | |
| 638 | 1.7B USD | 2 | 27 | |
| 639 | 2.4B USD | 2 | 33 | |
| 640 | 2.26T KRW (≈$1.6B) | 2 | 22 | |
| 641 | 3.5B USD | 2 | 23 | |
| 642 | 63.6B TRY (≈$1.9B) | 2 | 44 | |
| 643 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 2 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score