Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
How CTO Realty Growth, Inc. stacks up
CTO · against 241 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
75/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #63 of 242 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score29 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including CTO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 6.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.2% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 74% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.9% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 259 reported | 6.9% | 5.5% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 240 reported | 7.1% | 5.6% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 93 reported | 9.2% | 8.9% | 52% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 260 reported | 88.5% | 119.5% | 27% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 2 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 57 | 1.2B USD | 77 | 41 | |
| 57 | 14.3B THB (≈$401M) | 77 | 53 | |
| 61 | 1.1B USD | 76 | 43 | |
| 61 | 536M USD | 76 | 65 | |
| 63 | 749M USD | 75 | 74 | |
| 63 | 688M USD | 75 | 65 | |
| 63 | 936M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 75 | 62 | |
| 66 | 708M USD | 74 | 58 | |
| 66 | 804M USD | 74 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score