Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CTNM · against 400 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #31 of 401 · scores higher than 93% of peers · safety percentile 95
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)56 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including CTNM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CTNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 366 reported | 0.03× | 0.19× | 78% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 385 reported | 0.75 | 0.44 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 393 reported | 37.17× | 3.03× | 99% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 4 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 5 | 455M USD | 99 | 53 | |
| 27 | 389M USD | 96 | 33 | |
| 28 | 2.4B CNY (≈$331M) | 96 | 51 | |
| 29 | 647M USD | 95 | 40 | |
| 30 | 595M USD | 95 | 97 | |
| 31 | 365M USD | 95 | 41 | |
| 32 | 223M USD | 95 | 34 | |
| 33 | 593M USD | 95 | 40 | |
| 34 | 216M USD | 95 | 44 | |
| 35 | 3.2B CNY (≈$449M) | 95 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score