Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CTAS · against 67 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #20 of 68 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 38
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CTAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CTAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 65 reported | 0.52× | 0.73× | 72% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 67 reported | 0.92 | 0.97 | 58% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 67 reported | 1.45× | 1.17× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B USD | 92 | 71 | |
| 2 | 53.7B USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 3 | 318.3B DKK (≈$47.7B) | 68 | 45 | |
| 4 | 101.3B USD | 66 | 65 | |
| 5 | 11.30T JPY (≈$76.8B) | 61 | 51 | |
| 16 | 51.7B USD | 46 | 58 | |
| 17 | 15.68T JPY (≈$106.6B) | 43 | 41 | |
| 18 | 7.82T JPY (≈$53.2B) | 41 | 40 | |
| 19 | 57.0B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 20 | 89.4B USD | 38 | 57 | |
| 21 | 5.43T INR (≈$65.2B) | 35 | 55 | |
| 22 | 153.0B EUR (≈$168.3B) | 33 | 51 | |
| 23 | 118.1B EUR (≈$129.9B) | 31 | 60 | |
| 24 | 63.0B USD | 31 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score