Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CTA-PB · against 224 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #83 of 225 · scores higher than 63% of peers · safety percentile 56
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CTA-PB · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CTA-PB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 209 reported | 0.19× | 0.36× | 65% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 214 reported | Not reported | 1.08 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 226 reported | 1.51× | 2.28× | 25% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 226M USD | 100 | 68 | |
| 2 | 151M USD | 99 | ||
| 3 | 162M USD | 99 | ||
| 4 | 154M USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 211M USD | 99 | 40 | |
| 79 | 414M USD | 59 | 50 | |
| 80 | 8.8B USD | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 24 |
| 81 | Unavailable | 56 | 59 |
| 82 | 3.2B USD | 56 | 57 |
| 83 | Unavailable | 56 | 50 |
| 83 | 7.9B USD | 56 | 62 |
| 85 | 798M USD | 56 | 68 |
| 86 | 368M USD | 56 | 84 |
| 87 | 2.5B USD | 55 | 35 |