Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CSW · against 493 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #166 of 494 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 56
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)59 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CSW · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity and beta than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CSW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 487 reported | 0.85× | 0.50× | 34% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 477 reported | 0.81 | 0.75 | 46% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 472 reported | 2.70× | 1.54× | 86% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5.7B USD | 99 | 36 | |
| 3 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2.45T CLP (≈$2.7B) | 99 | ||
| 162 | 5.0B CHF (≈$5.8B) | 57 | 45 | |
| 163 | 7.2B USD | 57 | 70 | |
| 164 | 19.5B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 56 | 51 | |
| 165 | 3.1B USD | 56 | 64 | |
| 166 | 4.6B USD | 56 | 61 | |
| 167 | 512.5B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 56 | 70 | |
| 168 | 3.21T CLP (≈$3.5B) | 56 | 53 | |
| 169 | 36.6B NOK (≈$3.5B) | 56 | 57 | |
| 170 | 3.5B USD | 56 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score