Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Carriage Services, Inc.
How Carriage Services, Inc. stacks up
CSV · against 624 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
76/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #106 of 625 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score49 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including CSV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.3% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 9.0% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 94% of peers. Operating margin: 21.9% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CSV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CSV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 596 reported | 9.0% | 6.0% | 65% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 623 reported | 21.9% | 5.5% | 95% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 592 reported | 3.3% | 2.5% | 58% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 581 reported | 17.3% | 5.9% | 89% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 626 reported | 38.3% | 28.3% | 67% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CSV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 2 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 3 | 113.9B JPY (≈$775M) | 97 | 70 | |
| 103 | 8.3B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 77 | 84 | |
| 103 | 50.2B JPY (≈$341M) | 77 | 73 | |
| 103 | 96.8B JPY (≈$658M) | 77 | 60 | |
| 106 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 76 | 73 | |
| 106 | 544M USD | 76 | 50 | |
| 106 | 846M USD | 76 | 60 | |
| 106 | 34.4B INR (≈$413M) | 76 | 44 | |
| 110 | 135.3B JPY (≈$920M) | 75 | 56 | |
| 110 | 16.2B TWD (≈$504M) | 75 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score