Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Carriage Services, Inc.
How Carriage Services, Inc. stacks up
CSV · against 620 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #350 of 621 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score69 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including CSV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 70% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -15.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.7% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CSV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CSV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 622 reported | 2.4% | 2.2% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 424 reported | -15.8% | 0.7% | 35% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 620 reported | 3.7% | 3.4% | 51% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CSV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 2 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 87 | |
| 2 | 732.9B KRW (≈$528M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 4.8B CNY (≈$667M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 2 | 3.4B CNY (≈$470M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 341 | 503M SGD (≈$382M) | 39 | 58 | |
| 341 | 363M GBP (≈$473M) | 39 | 51 | |
| 350 | 108.4B JPY (≈$737M) | 38 | 53 | |
| 350 | 680M USD | 38 | 55 | |
| 350 | 544M USD | 38 | 50 | |
| 350 | 571M USD | 38 | 30 | |
| 350 | 37.7B INR (≈$452M) | 38 | 31 | |
| 355 | 454M SGD (≈$345M) | 37 | 59 | |
| 355 | 3.0B CNY (≈$424M) | 37 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score