Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CSTE · against 73 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #38 of 74 · scores higher than 49% of peers · safety percentile 43
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including CSTE · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker debt / equity than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CSTE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 66 reported | 0.94× | 0.58× | 34% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 71 reported | 0.49 | 0.50 | 51% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 73 reported | 1.59× | 1.50× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 881M HKD (≈$113M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 2 | 144M MYR (≈$32M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 3 | 391M MYR (≈$86M) | 98 | 61 | |
| 4 | 58M USD | 98 | 95 | |
| 5 | 147M MYR (≈$32M) | 98 | 77 | |
| 34 | 907M HKD (≈$116M) | 49 | 41 | |
| 35 | 272M MYR (≈$60M) | 48 | 47 | |
| 36 | 96M USD | 45 | 23 | |
| 37 | 287M HKD (≈$37M) | 44 | 16 | |
| 38 | 59M USD | 43 | 15 | |
| 39 | 47M AUD (≈$31M) | 43 | 40 | |
| 40 | 6.4B JPY (≈$44M) | 42 | 57 | |
| 41 | 914M SEK (≈$91M) | 40 | 33 | |
| 42 | 436M MYR (≈$96M) | 39 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score