Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CSL · against 241 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #173 of 242 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CSL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CSL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 237 reported | 1.79× | 0.54× | 9% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 233 reported | 0.83 | 0.86 | 54% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 234 reported | 2.60× | 1.50× | 86% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.4B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 96 | 70 | |
| 3 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 95 | 70 | |
| 4 | 1.44T JPY (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 5 | 28.8B USD | 94 | 73 | |
| 169 | 97.3B SEK (≈$9.7B) | 26 | 43 | |
| 170 | 22.7B USD | 26 | 41 | |
| 171 | 7.8B USD | 26 | 55 | |
| 172 | 89.0B SEK (≈$8.9B) | 26 | 48 | |
| 173 | 15.4B USD | 25 | 54 | |
| 174 | 20.6B USD | 25 | 61 | |
| 175 | 87.3B HKD (≈$11.2B) | 25 | 67 | |
| 176 | 10.2B USD | 25 | 28 | |
| 177 | 85.4B SEK (≈$8.5B) | 25 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score