Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CorVel Corporation
How CorVel Corporation stacks up
CRVL · against 69 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Profitability
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 70 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score10 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including CRVL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 67% of peers. Operating margin: 14.9% vs peer median 23.5%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 95% of peers. Return on invested capital: 71.7% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 96% of peers. Return on assets: 16.7% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRVL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRVL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 72 reported | 71.7% | 5.3% | 92% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 44 reported | 14.9% | 23.8% | 33% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 73 reported | 16.7% | 2.4% | 94% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 72 reported | 30.7% | 13.3% | 90% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 81 reported | 24.8% | 68.9% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRVL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.7B USD | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 4.2B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 2 | 2.7B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 2 | 5.3B GBP (≈$6.9B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 5 | 4.1B USD | 95 | 64 | |
| 6 | 5.5B EUR (≈$6.0B) | 94 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score