Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cirrus Logic, Inc.
How Cirrus Logic, Inc. stacks up
CRUS · against 315 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #190 of 316 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score30 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CRUS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.2% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 26.0% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRUS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 318 reported | 6.2% | 12.3% | 31% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 225 reported | 26.0% | 14.8% | 62% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 313 reported | 4.0% | 8.1% | 35% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRUS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 21.5B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 186 | 5.8B USD | 51 | 53 | |
| 186 | 7.4B USD | 51 | 42 | |
| 190 | 4.12T KRW (≈$3.0B) | 50 | 63 | |
| 190 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 50 | 56 | |
| 190 | 5.6B USD | 50 | 82 | |
| 190 | 7.1B USD | 50 | 68 | |
| 190 | 6.8B USD | 50 | 52 | |
| 195 | 46.1B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 49 | 59 | |
| 195 | 5.7B USD | 49 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score