Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Criteo S.A.
How Criteo S.A. stacks up
CRTO · against 142 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 143 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including CRTO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 87% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 23.9% vs peer median 7.4%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 91% of peers. Earnings yield: 12.9% vs peer median 2.9%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 95% of peers. EBITDA yield: 44.1% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRTO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRTO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 139 reported | 12.9% | 1.2% | 93% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 44.1% | 7.7% | 96% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 23.9% | 10.5% | 82% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 143 reported | 153.1% | 47.3% | 84% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRTO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.07T KRW (≈$770M) | 98 | 85 | |
| 4 | 743M USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 4 | 659M USD | 97 | 81 | |
| 6 | 906.5B KRW (≈$653M) | 96 | 47 | |
| 6 | 439.6B CLP (≈$484M) | 96 | 68 | |
| 6 | 393M USD | 96 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score