Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRSR · against 545 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #425 of 546 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 24
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)44 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CRSR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRSR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 523 reported | 0.27× | 0.21× | 44% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 524 reported | 1.94 | 0.75 | 6% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 541 reported | 1.75× | 1.89× | 46% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 421 | 1.4B USD | 25 | 33 | |
| 422 | 109.4B JPY (≈$744M) | 25 | 40 | |
| 423 | 5.2B CNY (≈$735M) | 24 | 35 | |
| 424 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 24 | 47 | |
| 425 | 1.3B USD | 24 | 40 | |
| 426 | 4.9B CNY (≈$685M) | 24 | 20 | |
| 427 | 7.4B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 24 | 56 | |
| 428 | 65.4B TWD (≈$2.0B) | 23 | 47 | |
| 429 | 721M EUR (≈$793M) | 23 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score