Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRSP · against 240 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #185 of 241 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score57 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including CRSP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | CRSP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 237 reported | -9.4% | 2.5% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 238 reported | -15.8% | 4.5% | 3% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 129 reported | -7.7% | 0.8% | 7% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 239 reported | 36.1% | 25.9% | 64% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 4 | 21.1B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 4 | 428.3B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 185 | 3.4B USD | 8 | 17 | |
| 185 | 5.7B USD | 8 | 52 | |
| 185 | 5.4B USD | 8 | 38 | |
| 185 | 9.0B USD | 8 | 51 | |
| 185 | 4.8B USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 185 | 8.7B USD | 8 | 26 | |
| 185 | 3.1B USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 185 | 4.6B USD | 8 | 29 | |
| 185 | 3.4B USD | 8 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score