Back to Carpenter Technology Corporation

How Carpenter Technology Corporation stacks up

CRS · against 468 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed

Overall

71/ 100

Near the top of its peers.

Ranked #32 of 469 · scores higher than 92% of peers

Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the overall score

35 peers with an overall score of 70–79, including CRS · Click a bar to see the companies

The four scores behind it

Overall = average of valuation, growth, profitability and safety percentile (categories without data are skipped)

Valuation#255 of 473Score 41 / 100 · beats 45%Growth#165 of 446Score 72 / 100 · beats 62%Profitability#31 of 469Score 96 / 100 · beats 91%Risk#84 of 474Lower relative risk · safety 74 · beats 82%

Ranking by overall score

Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRS

Rank	Company	Market cap	Overall	Valuation	Growth	Profitability	Risk
1	One and one Green Technologies. IncYDDL · US-listed	58M USD	95	98	89	95	0 / 2
2	Euroseas Ltd.ESEA · US-listed	462M USD	86	100	55	97	0 / 2
3	Mueller Industries, Inc.MLI · US-listed	12.3B USD	83	69	72	99	0 / 2
4	Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.ASR · US-listed	7.8B USD	82	72	70	99	0 / 2
4	StealthGas Inc.GASS · US-listed	323M USD	82	100	39	89	0 / 2
⋯
27	Insteel Industries Inc.IIIN · US-listed	553M USD	72	66	63	67	0 / 2
27	TAT Technologies Ltd.TATT · US-listed	504M USD	72	35	89	72	0 / 2
27	Triton International LimitedTRTN-PA · US-listed	Unavailable	72	87	68	81	1 / 2
32	Brady CorporationBRC · US-listed	3.9B USD	71	58	62	90	0 / 2
32	Carpenter Technology CorporationCRS · US-listed	14.7B USD	71	41	72	96	0 / 2
32	Fastenal CompanyFAST · US-listed	60.0B USD	71	27	65	99	0 / 2
32	Pangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd.PANL · US-listed	496M USD	71	91	97	58	1 / 2
32	Snap-on IncorporatedSNA · US-listed	18.7B USD	71	59	43	96	0 / 2
32	Twin Disc, IncorporatedTWIN · US-listed	364M USD	71	65	87	59	0 / 2

Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…