Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRNC · against 537 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #490 of 538 · scores higher than 9% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)47 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including CRNC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRNC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 507 reported | 1.12× | 0.21× | 12% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 520 reported | 3.04 | 0.68 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 542 reported | 2.08× | 1.91× | 57% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 4 | 308M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 5 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 486 | 244M EUR (≈$269M) | 11 | 42 | |
| 487 | 2.5B CNY (≈$347M) | 11 | 3 | |
| 488 | 257M EUR (≈$283M) | 10 | 49 | |
| 489 | 408M USD | 10 | 27 | |
| 490 | 374M USD | 10 | 35 | |
| 491 | 326M EUR (≈$358M) | 10 | 52 | |
| 492 | 20.2B TWD (≈$626M) | 10 | 22 | |
| 493 | 375M EUR (≈$412M) | 9 | 41 | |
| 494 | 525.6B KRW (≈$378M) | 9 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score