Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Carter's, Inc.
How Carter's, Inc. stacks up
CRI · against 513 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
86/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #62 of 514 · scores higher than 87% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including CRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.7% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 98% of peers. Earnings yield: 19.3% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 511 reported | 19.3% | 4.7% | 98% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 525 reported | 12.7% | 9.0% | 70% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | Not reported | 7.0% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 511 reported | 91.8% | 57.0% | 72% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 4.6B HKD (≈$593M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 62 | 2.59T KRW (≈$1.9B) | 86 | 41 | |
| 62 | 192.0B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 86 | 71 | |
| 62 | 181.3B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 86 | 63 | |
| 62 | 126.8B JPY (≈$862M) | 86 | 75 | |
| 62 | 1.1B USD | 86 | 52 | |
| 62 | 1.8B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 86 | 76 | |
| 62 | 770M USD | 86 | 48 | |
| 69 | 184.7B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 85 | 65 | |
| 69 | 96.5B JPY (≈$656M) | 85 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score