Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CRH plc
How CRH plc stacks up
CRH · against 221 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #63 of 222 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including CRH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.7% vs peer median 2.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.6% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 211 reported | 5.7% | 3.0% | 71% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 216 reported | 9.7% | 8.9% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 196 reported | 4.1% | 2.3% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 212 reported | 40.2% | 45.5% | 42% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 768M USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 4 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 62 | |
| 5 | 6.2B USD | 95 | 77 | |
| 60 | 2.5B USD | 67 | 60 | |
| 62 | 318M USD | 66 | 77 | |
| 63 | 5.5B USD | 65 | 38 | |
| 63 | 1.1B USD | 65 | 50 | |
| 63 | 62.2B USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 63 | 2.7B USD | 65 | 51 | |
| 67 | 10.6B USD | 64 | 53 | |
| 67 | 301M USD | 64 | 88 | |
| 67 | 6.9B USD | 64 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score