Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CRH plc
How CRH plc stacks up
CRH · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
60/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #107 of 183 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CRH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 17.4% vs peer median 9.4%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.3% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 4.6% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 6.3% | 9.9% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | 17.4% | 17.1% | 51% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | 4.6% | 1.5% | 59% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 102 | 3.3B USD | 63 | 54 | |
| 104 | 5.0B USD | 62 | 62 | |
| 105 | 1.0B USD | 61 | 70 | |
| 105 | 6.2B USD | 61 | 61 | |
| 107 | 62.2B USD | 60 | 54 | |
| 108 | 4.0B USD | 59 | 46 | |
| 108 | 8.1B USD | 59 | 66 | |
| 108 | 36.9B USD | 59 | 52 | |
| 111 | 3.2B USD | 58 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score