Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
How Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd stacks up
CRDO · against 133 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
100/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 134 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score26 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including CRDO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 100?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 95% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 296.0% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 99% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 109.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: 165.1% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRDO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRDO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 134 reported | 165.1% | 13.8% | 98% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 118 reported | 296.0% | 21.1% | 92% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 109.6% | 8.6% | 97% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRDO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 4 | 42.6B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 5 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 5 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 5 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 98 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score