Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Crawford & Company
How Crawford & Company stacks up
CRD-A · against 124 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Profitability
65/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #29 of 125 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score10 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including CRD-A · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 79% of peers. Operating margin: 5.6% vs peer median 23.5%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.1% vs peer median 2.6%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 83% of peers. Return on invested capital: 23.7% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRD-A, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRD-A | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 120 reported | 23.7% | 4.8% | 90% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 61 reported | 5.6% | 19.6% | 25% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 145 reported | 3.1% | 2.6% | 62% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 140 reported | 13.0% | 5.6% | 76% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 162 reported | 28.7% | 100.0% | 19% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRD-A| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 527M AUD (≈$348M) | 97 | 64 | |
| 4 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 96 | 67 | |
| 5 | 323M EUR (≈$355M) | 93 | 59 | |
| 24 | 434M USD | 70 | 43 | |
| 26 | 1.3B MYR (≈$289M) | 67 | 49 | |
| 26 | 566M USD | 67 | 75 | |
| 28 | 7.1B HKD (≈$914M) | 66 | 48 | |
| 29 | 538M USD | 65 | 43 | |
| 29 | 465M USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 29 | 501M EUR (≈$551M) | 65 | 58 | |
| 32 | 3.6B HKD (≈$461M) | 64 | 61 | |
| 32 | 405M USD | 64 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score