Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc.
How Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. stacks up
CPS · against 522 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #296 of 523 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score43 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -15.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 73% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.7% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 511 reported | -15.3% | 3.2% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 535 reported | 13.2% | 8.5% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | -1.3% | 7.1% | 24% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 514 reported | -35.8% | 67.7% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 293 | 307M USD | 39 | 27 | |
| 293 | 303M EUR (≈$333M) | 39 | 43 | |
| 296 | 14.8B TWD (≈$459M) | 38 | 44 | |
| 296 | 3.5B CNY (≈$487M) | 38 | 41 | |
| 296 | 365M USD | 38 | 20 | |
| 296 | 327M GBP (≈$425M) | 38 | 46 | |
| 296 | 18.2B THB (≈$509M) | 38 | 48 | |
| 296 | 378M USD | 38 | 26 | |
| 296 | 700M CAD (≈$511M) | 38 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score