Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc.
How Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. stacks up
CPS · against 528 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
22/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #373 of 529 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score58 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including CPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.8% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.1% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 532 reported | 2.1% | 1.7% | 52% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | Not reported | -1.5% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 528 reported | 0.8% | 2.2% | 43% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 2 | 732.9B KRW (≈$528M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 4.8B CNY (≈$667M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 2 | 3.4B CNY (≈$470M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 373 | 3.1B CNY (≈$433M) | 22 | 37 | |
| 373 | 16.2B TWD (≈$504M) | 22 | 60 | |
| 373 | 2.7B CNY (≈$384M) | 22 | 31 | |
| 373 | 5.2B CNY (≈$729M) | 22 | 70 | |
| 373 | 365M USD | 22 | 20 | |
| 373 | 447M USD | 22 | 29 | |
| 373 | 402M AUD (≈$265M) | 22 | 40 | |
| 373 | 3.9B SEK (≈$394M) | 22 | 38 | |
| 382 | 3.4B HKD (≈$432M) | 21 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score