Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Copart, Inc.
How Copart, Inc. stacks up
CPRT · against 158 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #44 of 159 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CPRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.7% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.2% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPRT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | 5.0% | 3.5% | 75% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 159 reported | 7.7% | 5.6% | 70% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 83 reported | 4.7% | 3.4% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | 31.6% | 22.1% | 65% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPRT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 34.8B USD | 89 | 52 | |
| 4 | 271.0B CNY (≈$37.9B) | 88 | 58 | |
| 4 | 15.8B EUR (≈$17.4B) | 88 | 50 | |
| 41 | 18.7B USD | 59 | 71 | |
| 42 | 21.3B USD | 57 | 49 | |
| 42 | 17.9B EUR (≈$19.7B) | 57 | 66 | |
| 44 | 3.91T JPY (≈$26.6B) | 56 | 70 | |
| 44 | 28.8B USD | 56 | 73 | |
| 46 | 495.6B TRY (≈$14.9B) | 55 | 52 | |
| 46 | 29.2B USD | 55 | 50 | |
| 48 | 7.82T JPY (≈$53.2B) | 54 | 40 | |
| 48 | 15.4B USD | 54 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score