Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Copart, Inc.
How Copart, Inc. stacks up
CPRT · against 155 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #109 of 156 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CPRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: 0.4% vs peer median 4.4%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -0.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPRT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 157 reported | 0.4% | 7.3% | 19% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 139 reported | -0.1% | 9.5% | 28% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 155 reported | 6.4% | 6.4% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPRT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.39T INR (≈$16.7B) | 97 | 54 | |
| 3 | 22.7B USD | 96 | 41 | |
| 4 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 4 | 20.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 104 | 29.2B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 108 | 26.6B USD | 45 | 55 | |
| 109 | 140.3B CNY (≈$19.6B) | 44 | 44 | |
| 109 | 5.51T JPY (≈$37.5B) | 44 | 58 | |
| 109 | 28.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 109 | 20.3B CHF (≈$23.4B) | 44 | 43 | |
| 109 | 15.8B USD | 44 | 45 | |
| 114 | 453.2B SEK (≈$45.3B) | 43 | 50 | |
| 114 | 18.7B USD | 43 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score