Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Capri Holdings Limited
How Capri Holdings Limited stacks up
CPRI · against 419 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
30/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #335 of 420 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score39 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including CPRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 83% of peers. Operating margin: 0.7% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.0% vs peer median 7.3%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.0% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 398 reported | 5.0% | 8.8% | 29% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 419 reported | 0.7% | 7.8% | 9% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 401 reported | 3.0% | 4.0% | 36% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 390 reported | Not reported | 10.2% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 422 reported | 63.3% | 31.2% | 92% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 4 | 404.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 4 | 3.9B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 331 | 3.1B CAD (≈$2.3B) | 31 | 40 | |
| 335 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 30 | 45 | |
| 335 | 21.8B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 30 | 51 | |
| 335 | 17.0B MYR (≈$3.7B) | 30 | 58 | |
| 335 | 2.1B USD | 30 | 30 | |
| 335 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 30 | 33 | |
| 335 | 4.1B USD | 30 | 34 | |
| 341 | 3.51T KRW (≈$2.5B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 341 | 8.6B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 29 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score