Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
How Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. stacks up
CPAC · against 511 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Profitability
81/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #68 of 512 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score45 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including CPAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 72% of peers. Return on assets: 5.0% vs peer median 2.5%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 79% of peers. Operating margin: 16.4% vs peer median 7.6%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 88% of peers. Return on invested capital: 24.1% vs peer median 6.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPAC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 487 reported | 24.1% | 6.1% | 92% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 501 reported | 16.4% | 6.6% | 83% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 486 reported | 5.0% | 2.2% | 79% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 483 reported | 18.4% | 4.9% | 89% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 526 reported | 41.6% | 19.7% | 85% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPAC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 436M GBP (≈$566M) | 98 | 76 | |
| 1 | 934M AUD (≈$617M) | 98 | 85 | |
| 1 | 2.0B USD | 98 | 89 | |
| 1 | 2.0B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$673M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 68 | 4.8B CNY (≈$669M) | 81 | 60 | |
| 68 | 4.9B CNY (≈$692M) | 81 | 74 | |
| 68 | 15.2B NOK (≈$1.4B) | 81 | 59 | |
| 68 | 152.9B INR (≈$1.8B) | 81 | 78 | |
| 68 | 1.1B USD | 81 | 50 | |
| 68 | 1.1B GBP (≈$1.4B) | 81 | 54 | |
| 68 | 127.8B INR (≈$1.5B) | 81 | 66 | |
| 76 | 11.5B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 80 | 52 | |
| 76 | 108.6B JPY (≈$739M) | 80 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score