Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
How Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. stacks up
CPAC · against 490 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #259 of 491 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score53 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CPAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -22.5% vs peer median 9.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 0.0% vs peer median -0.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPAC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 7.0% | 2.5% | 63% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 308 reported | -22.5% | 4.2% | 25% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 487 reported | 0.0% | -0.7% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPAC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B CAD (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 2 | 11.8B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 823.2B KRW (≈$593M) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 5 | 11.3B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 97 | 62 | |
| 259 | 6.3B HKD (≈$801M) | 43 | 43 | |
| 259 | 190.6B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 43 | 63 | |
| 259 | 41.8B TWD (≈$1.3B) | 43 | 66 | |
| 259 | 2.0B USD | 43 | 22 | |
| 259 | 1.1B USD | 43 | 50 | |
| 259 | 39.5B TRY (≈$1.2B) | 43 | 67 | |
| 266 | 4.3B CNY (≈$602M) | 42 | 42 | |
| 266 | 10.3B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 42 | 56 | |
| 266 | 191.9B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 42 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score