Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
How Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited stacks up
CP · against 73 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #34 of 74 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score21 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.7% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | 3.4% | 3.2% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | 6.2% | 5.4% | 71% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 2.6% | 3.5% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | 41.4% | 16.8% | 89% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B EUR (≈$66.0B) | 83 | 54 | |
| 2 | 71.0B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 3 | 54.8B USD | 73 | 49 | |
| 3 | 318.3B DKK (≈$47.7B) | 73 | 45 | |
| 5 | 5.85T JPY (≈$39.8B) | 68 | 62 | |
| 30 | 81.6B USD | 41 | 46 | |
| 30 | 74.4B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 30 | 135.1B EUR (≈$148.6B) | 41 | 47 | |
| 34 | 11.30T JPY (≈$76.8B) | 40 | 51 | |
| 34 | 79.3B USD | 40 | 50 | |
| 34 | 110.4B EUR (≈$121.5B) | 40 | 52 | |
| 34 | 76.6B USD | 40 | 42 | |
| 34 | 47.7B USD | 40 | 55 | |
| 39 | 45.6B USD | 39 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score