Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COST · against 6 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #7 of 7 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including COST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | COST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | 2.2% | 3.8% | 0% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | 3.5% | 5.1% | 0% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 4 reported | 2.1% | 4.1% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | 8.6% | 15.0% | 17% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.57T CNY (≈$220.3B) | 43 | 73 | |
| 2 | 343.3B USD | 38 | 52 | |
| 3 | 194.4B CHF (≈$223.5B) | 36 | 36 | |
| 4 | 300.3B USD | 31 | 54 | |
| 5 | 369.2B USD | 27 | 54 | |
| 5 | 199.4B EUR (≈$219.4B) | 27 | 44 | |
| 7 | 417.7B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 20 |
| 52 |