Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COST · against 149 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #122 of 150 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including COST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | COST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 2.2% | 3.9% | 34% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 151 reported | 3.5% | 9.2% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 2.1% | 5.9% | 17% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 142 reported | 8.6% | 40.5% | 11% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3B USD | 96 | 52 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 95 | 83 | |
| 3 | 903M USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 3 | 7.3B USD | 94 | 73 | |
| 5 | 222M USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 116 | 7.4B USD | 23 | 18 | |
| 119 | 1.5B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 22 |
| 119 | 84.0B USD | 22 | 74 |
| 121 | 1.3B USD | 21 | 29 |
| 122 | 417.7B USD | 20 | 52 |
| 122 | 34.2B USD | 20 | 31 |
| 122 | 6.2B USD | 20 | 44 |
| 125 | 529M USD | 19 | 22 |
| 125 | 26.1B USD | 19 | 22 |