Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Compass, Inc.
How Compass, Inc. stacks up
COMP · against 124 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 125 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including COMP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 27.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: 67.8% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = COMP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | COMP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 126 reported | 67.8% | 6.0% | 96% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 108 reported | Not reported | 11.7% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 123 reported | 27.8% | 7.4% | 94% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around COMP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 5 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 97 | 62 | |
| 7 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 96 | 58 | |
| 7 | 662.0B INR (≈$7.9B) | 96 | 62 | |
| 9 | 54.5B BRL (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score