Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COKE · against 88 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #84 of 89 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including COKE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | COKE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 88 reported | Not reported | 0.60× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 86 reported | 0.54 | 0.33 | 25% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 83 reported | 1.21× | 1.25× | 48% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 2 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 3 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 4 | 55.6B CNY (≈$7.8B) | 83 | 57 | |
| 5 | 118.9B CNY (≈$16.7B) | 83 | 61 | |
| 80 | 29.1B AUD (≈$19.2B) | 8 | 37 | |
| 81 | 9.8B EUR (≈$10.7B) | 7 | 36 | |
| 82 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.6B) | 7 | 47 | |
| 83 | 7.5B GBP (≈$9.8B) | 6 | 37 | |
| 84 | 13.7B USD | 6 | 51 | |
| 85 | 11.3B USD | 4 | 35 | |
| 86 | 18.2B USD | 4 | 11 | |
| 87 | 13.1B USD | 3 | 45 | |
| 88 | 11.7B USD | 2 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score