Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COCO · against 155 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #50 of 156 · scores higher than 68% of peers · safety percentile 73
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)27 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including COCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | COCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 154 reported | 0.04× | 0.37× | 85% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 155 reported | 0.75 | 0.35 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 150 reported | 3.36× | 1.71× | 84% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 3 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 5 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 46 | 24.2B HKD (≈$3.1B) | 74 | 64 | |
| 47 | 5.3B USD | 74 | 71 | |
| 48 | 298.6B JPY (≈$2.0B) | 74 | 49 | |
| 49 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 73 | 73 | |
| 50 | 3.5B USD | 73 | 73 | |
| 51 | 29.73T IDR (≈$1.8B) | 72 | 60 | |
| 52 | 24.7B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 72 | 61 | |
| 53 | 6.4B NZD (≈$3.8B) | 72 | 58 | |
| 54 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 72 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score