Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
How The Vita Coco Company, Inc. stacks up
COCO · against 147 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Growth
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 148 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score21 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including COCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 89% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 90% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 70.3% vs peer median 1.5%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: 26.1% vs peer median 2.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = COCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | COCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 26.1% | 4.1% | 91% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 109 reported | 70.3% | 4.5% | 92% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | 14.9% | 3.5% | 87% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around COCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 2 | 536M USD | 99 | 39 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 607M USD | 98 | 67 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 7.8B USD | 97 | 83 | |
| 5 | 272M USD | 97 | 47 | |
| 8 | 7.6B USD | 96 | 45 | |
| 8 | 650M USD | 96 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score